exciting article

Just read an interesting article about the Collaborating and Management of Suicidality (CAMS). I can’t believe this theory is 25 years old. It is gaining more acceptance as time goes on as more countries are using it as a treatment modality in suicidal people. It is a clinical intervention that is used as a collaboration between client and therapist in the treatment and care of a suicidal person. I find it one of the best out there and it is the best because it can be used across the disciplines in the mental health field.

I will be writing more about this. I write a lot about Jobes, the creator of CAMS and the SSF (suicide status form). He is the most brilliant person I have ever met. The fact that this is going to electronic way I think will be used across mediums and will be easier to deliver. Most clinicians have gone the electronic way but not all. This makes me want to go back to school and get my degree.

stigma and suicide

Stigma and suicidality
“Among the 10 leading causes of death in the U.S. most are claiming fewer lives each year but sadly suicide is on of the few that continues to rise. Depression and other diseases of the mind that contribute to suicide are real illnesses, not weaknesses. Not character flaws. People battling these illnesses deserve understanding and treatment afforded people with any other llness.” Robert Gabbia AFSP Executive Director.

There is a stigma out there that mental illnesses are not real. That if you just pull your boot straps up you will be ok and not suffer from depression. I have a friend in Canada, a place where the suicide rate is higher than the US because they are still in the dark about treating depression and other mental illnesses. Like Mr. Gabbhia states this is not a character flaw or a weakness. This is real. It takes character and strength to admit there is something wrong and to see help for it. And if you don’t succeed the first time try again until you do.

If I didn’t try and try again, I probably wouldn’t be here today. I probably would have taken my life. I have seen over 10 therapists over the course of my treatment for my mental illness. My current therapist I have been with for the past twelve years and it has been the a huge difference. With the stability of treatment providers I don’t go to the hospital as much and with the value of trust between us, I can state my suicidal feelings without being held against my will in some treatment facility. I am open about how I feel with my therapist but it took a long time to get to where I was. It took about 3-4 years to really trust her and for her to trust me.

I say that it takes trust between us because most therapist are under the believe that all people that have suicidal thoughts should be hospitalized immediately if they cannot be held to safety contracts, which are worthless. Therapist think this is the way to go but it is not. It just takes the legality of it all away from the therapist and really does not put trust in the relationship. Nor does it build an alliance with the therapist because the client is always in fear of being put into the hospital for fear of stating their true feelings. Is that how therapy is supposed to go? Again you have the stigma that if you talk about suicide, you will cause suicide. That is a common myth that everyone still believes is true except for those that actually deal with it. Like me and other suicidologists around the country. Those that deal with suicide are afraid of being sued but there are measures that can be taken so that it is not as frightening as it is. I am not saying that the person with a loaded gun or is in eminent danger and threatening suicide should not be hospitalized and that that gun or other means NOT be taken away. I am saying for those that are chronically suicidal be given a chance that doesn’t include the hospital all the time. In the course of my therapy over the past twelve years I have been hospitalized 4-6 times, compared to twice a year for the previous ten years.

For resources on dealing with suicide:
http://www.suicidology.org the American Association of Suicidology.

Jobes, D. A. (2006). Managing suicidal risk: A collaborative approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Michel, K., & Jobes, D. A. (2011). Building a therapeutic alliance with the suicidal patient. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; US.

comparisons of psychological pain scales

Suicide attempts are the leading reason why people go to see a mental health professional. What does it mean after an attempt and will the person get the help they need. There are many assessments on risks but few deal with the psychological pain that is attached to the attempt. In my research I have found three clinicians that have developed assessments to help deal with this issue. They are Dr. David Jobes from Catholic University of America, Dr. Israel Orbach in Israel, and Dr. Ronald Holden from Queen’s university in Canada.

Dr. David Jobes wrote and developed what is known as a suicide status form and believes that by collaborating with the client, you can decrease the suicidality (Jobes, 2006; Jobes & Drozd, 2004; Michel & Jobes, 2011). The form consists of three parts: initial, tracking, and outcome. The initial form has the initial evaluation of suicidality, followed by a treatment plan agreed upon by both client and clinician, and then clinical notes such as axis I diagnosis, mood status and session outcome (follow up appt, discharge, or hospitalization). The tracking and outcome are similar in nature. Tracking follows the suicidality. This is used until suicidality is resolved. I base his study on research articles and the two books he has written on the subject.

Dr. Ronald Holden was able to validate his scale of psychache that has helped to focus treatment on psychological pain. This is a 13 item scale rated on a Likert rating of 1-5. The total number of points is 65. The higher the psychache, the higher risk of suicide. The first 9 items deal with the psychological underpinning of what is causing suicidal thinking. The last 4 items deal with the likelihood that this person will act on it. His work I base on his research article.

Israel Orbach (Orbach, Mandrusiak, Gilboa-Schectman, & Sirota, 2003; Orbach, Mikulincer, Sirota, & Gilboa-Schectman, 2003) also has a mental pain scale but has 44 items and cannot be used, in this author’s opinion, in the clinical setting but does have some merit in the initial evaluation of psychological pain. The overall score is intricate and complex as it breaks down the 44 items into quartiles. The study was very small, less than 50 participants and was broken down into two parts. I base his study on his research article.

These combined formed my contention that psychological pain is a causal factor in suicidal thinking.

Suicide status form:
This is a collaborative effort between client and therapist in understanding the reason why a person is suicidal. These forms, initial, tracking, and outcome, provide a base for which to form a treatment plan for working on decreasing suicidality. It was built on the theories of multiple clinicians in the field of suicidality. These clinicians are Shneidman (Shneidman, 1993), who focused on psychological pain, Beck, who focused on cognitive treatment of depression, Baumeister (Baumeister, 1990), escape theory in suicide as escape from self, Linehan (Linehan, Goodstein, Lars Nielson, & Chiles, 1983), reasons for living when you want to die, and Jobes (Jobes, 1995), tracking suicidality.

Dr. Jobes has developed an assessment tool and mangement for suicidality. This management includes the suicide status form (SSF) and uniquely tailors the treatment around individual needs. This is based on the client’s direct input into their treatment. This collaboration takes away the therapist as expert and puts the client in charge of treatment. This also makes things more comfortable and meaningful. Dr. Jobes believes that by tracking the course of treatment, there may be better outcomes and those that are suicidal do not go by the way side, meaning get lost in the system or are ignored after their treatment ends. In his seminal work (Jobes, 1995), he found that nearly half of those that reported to be stressed and suicidal responded to treatment. The other half either dropped out of treatment, got hospitalized, or remained chronically suicidal. This propelled him to develop the SSF to keep track of the suicidal clients and their outcome.

OMMP: Orbach and Mikulinger Mental Pain Scale.
This scale is a 44 item assessment that measures mental pain on nine factors ranging from irreversibility, loss of control, narcissist wounds, emotional flooding, freezing, self-estrangement, confusion, social distancing, and emptiness. These factors are what contributes to mental pain as explained by the authors (see Orbach et al, 2003). Items are scored on a Likert scale of 1-5. In my opinion, given the complexity of this assessment, it cannot be used for clinical use but does hold a valuable research tool.

Holden scale.
Dr. Holden’s psychache scale is a thirteen question self-report of items based upon Shneidman’s book, Suicide as Psychache (1993). Psychache is defined as despair, anguish, hopelessness, and psychological pain one feels. Each items are ranked on a 1-5 point scale ranging from never to always agree, neither, or from strongly disagree to strongly agree (Holden, Mehta, Cunningham, & McLeod, 2001). Scores are from thirteen to sixty-five. This scale is easy to use and can be used clinically, with the permission of the author to reproduce it. What I like about this scale is that it is user friendly, scores can be added quickly, and the tracking of suicide can be seen. With higher results, suicide is more likely to occur. The lower the score, the lower the risk of suicide.

These three assessments are comparatively the same but are just called different things. The main point of suicide ideation is to find out what is driving the person to think about suicide and to try and prevent it from happening. Ideally these scales should be used in the first session and the Holden and/or SSF used thereafter.

Baumeister, R. (1990). Suicide as Escape From Self. Psychological Review, 97(1), 90-113.
Holden, R. R., Mehta, K., Cunningham, E., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Development and preliminary validation of a scale of psychache. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(4), 224-232.
Jobes, D. A. (1995). The challenge and the promise of clinical suicidology. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 25(4), 437-449.
Jobes, D. A. (2006). Managing suicidal risk: A collaborative approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Jobes, D. A., & Drozd, J. F. (2004). The CAMS approach to working with suicidal patients. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 34(1), 73-85.
Linehan, M., Goodstein, J., Lars Nielson, S., & Chiles, J. (1983). Reasons for Staying Alive When You Are Thinking of Killing Yourself: The Reasons for Living Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(2), 276-286.
Michel, K., & Jobes, D. A. (2011). Building a therapeutic alliance with the suicidal patient. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; US.
Orbach, I., Mandrusiak, M., Gilboa-Schectman, E., & Sirota, P. (2003). Mental Pain and Its Relationship to Suicidality and Life Meaning. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 33(3), 231-241.
Orbach, I., Mikulincer, M., Sirota, P., & Gilboa-Schectman, E. (2003). Mental Pain: A Multidimensional Operationalization and Definition. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 33(3), 219-230.
Shneidman, E. S. (1993). Suicide as psychache: A clinical approach to self-destructive behavior. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.

Copyright 2013 Collerone, G

how to save a life paper

Music is an important part of the human race. Each individual has his/her own genre they prefer. Music can help heal a broken heart, discharge stress and to relax while going to sleep.
Often times music’s lyrics can hold a very powerful message. That is my goal with this essay to write about the song, “how to save a life” (The Fray, 2005). By using personal and clinical information, I hope to inform the mental health professionals about how to save a life when a client is thinking about suicide and what it means to get help from a mental health professional. This paper is written from the view point of a clinician and a patient who is engaged in therapy.
Jobes, Moore, and O’Connor (2007) have stated that assessing a patient’s suicide risk at each medical office visit as collecting vital signs. Quinnett (1987) has stated that there is only a ten minute window of when a person thinking of suicide will actually go through with it. It is extending those minutes that is an important step to prevent a suicide.
Sometimes there are signs indicating suicidal thinking such as, giving away of possessions, saying things will be better if I just “go away”. Sometimes these signs are not so subtle. In the wake of a completed suicide, one often wonders, “what they could have done differently”.
The rock band, The Fray, has written a song called, “how to save a life”(Slade, 2005). I would like to express in this essay, how important these lyrics are to help save a life, whether it is someone else’s or your own.

“Step one you say we need to talk
He walks you say sit down it’s just a talk
He smiles politely back at you
You stare politely right on through
Some sort of window to your right
As he goes left and you stay right
Between the lines of fear and blame
You begin to wonder why you came”

These opening lines talk about the initial conversation when the person who is having suicidal thoughts is being confronted. This is a crucial conversation as it allows you to assess what the person is thinking and to let them know you are concerned. The lyrics could also be viewed as the initial consultation a clinician has with his or her client, whether it was initiated by a friend, significant other, or family member. Family and/or friends are hoping that this person, who means so much to them, can open up to this person (therapist, minister, or counselor) to get the help that they (friend or family member) cannot offer or give. This is not to say that the friend or family has rejected the individual in his or her distress. The distressed individual may just need an unbiased, neutral person to talk openly about how they are feeling and what has brought them to the verge of suicide. Life for this person at this point is bleak, hopeless and unworthiness has invaded their soul. The individual feels he or she cannot confide in others. He or she feel they are a burden to friends and family members and have begun to shut himself off from those that love them. He sees only one option left to them: suicide. This is very dangerous thinking. The four letter word “only” is very significant and carries a lot of weight. Dr. Edwin Shneidman spent his career in working in the field of suicidality and forming the foundation for suicidologists in the United States. According to him, this word is the most “dangerous” word to be spoken by a suicidal person (E. Shneidman, 1985).
As long as there is human life, the threat of suicide is always going to be an issue. It is an indiscriminate symptom of mental illness, such as bipolar depression, major depression or schizophrenia. Some times suicide is not related to mental illness at all. It could be a response to a crisis that seems to have no end. Whatever the reason, “suicide will be a permanent solution to a temporary problem” (Quinnett, 1987).
Some experts will say that suicide is preventable, others believe that it is treatable. I say that it is manageable. When suicide becomes the only option, the question becomes what to do with this suicidal thinking: if the individual reaches out, they may go to a friend or family member for help or suffer along and pray his distress will end.
Most clinicians do not know much about suicide. Each clinician has their way of dealing with it or perhaps, not dealing with it at all. Some will refer their client to another clinician the moment suicidal thinking is mentioned. Most almost always use what is known as a safety contract: essentially an agreement, written, verbal, or both, saying that the client will not harm or kill himself or herself in any way until the next session with the therapist. If the client does not agree to this, the option is that the client will be hospitalized, often against involuntarily. If the clinician fails to hospitalize a client that is in danger of hurting themselves and the client dies, the clinician is subject to malpractice and potentially the loss of the licensure. In Rudd’s article (2006) 41% of clients under contract died by suicide or made a serious suicide attempt. These contracts have no legal standing but are used from a medicolegal point of view. To ensure the liability of the clinician, the client is placed in the hospital. In my opinion, this is the clinician’s get of jail free card and the jail term of the client. The lyrics: “Let him know that you know best/Cause after all you do know best” best describe this situation.
Is there a better way of dealing with this small yet extremely vulnerable population? There are structured treatment plans for patients at risk for suicide, but the knowledge of this across all mental health professionals is limited. It takes a mediocre trained clinician to have the courage to want to treat the client’s plea for help and to stick with that person through this difficult time.
There are two clinicians who have revolutionized the understanding of suicidal thinking and behaviors. Dr. Ronald Holden at the Queen’s University in Canada and Dr. David Jobes at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., have two forms that are easy to use and are not time consuming. These forms, the psychache scale (Holden, Mehta, Cunningham, & McLeod, 2001) and the Suicide Status Form (SSF;David A. Jobes, 2006) can be used in the first fifteen minutes of a session to assess the client’s mental health status.
Dr. Holden’s psychache scale is a thirteen question self report of items based upon Shneidman’s book, Suicide as Psychache (1993). Psychache is defined as despair, anguish, hopelessness, psychological pain one feels. Each items are ranked on a 5 point scale ranging from either never to always or from strongly disagree to strongly agree (Holden, et al., 2001). Scores are from thirteen to sixty-five.
The chorus is what brought me to write this paper. The following is the lyrics:
Where did I go wrong, I lost a friend
Some where along in the bitterness
And I would have stayed up with you all night
Had I known how to save a life
Sometimes in my own suicidal thinking I had wished “someone would have stayed up with” me all night. Just to have the reassurance that you are not alone and that someone cares that much, helps to diffuse the feelings of hopelessness and helplessness that the depression and weight of the world is bringing. It also helps to know that this difficulty will pass and the individual will get through this. It also helps to know that difficulties will pass and the individual will be able to move on. It is crucial that the individual knows this for tomorrow does not exist and the important thing is to get through today.
In Shneidman’s classic work, ¬Definition of Suicide, he states that “suicide should not be attempted while feeling suicidal” (1985, p. 139). The reason for this is because the thinking of the mind is focused solely like a never ending black tunnel. The constriction is so great; all you can think about is death and cessation. Time for them is in a warp full of pain and despair; there is no tomorrow. Their thinking is solely focused on what they need to do to ease their pain no matter what. Constriction is defined by Shneidman as the “honing in, the tightening down of the diaphragm of the mind. There is dichotomous thinking, a fixation on a single pain-free solution or death. Choices seem limited to two or one” (Shneidman, 1999).
Sometimes during this constriction, you are so overwhelmed by all that needs to be done you don’t know what to tackle first. This might be tasks at work, school, or just in general. Lists become an important tool that can help to prevent suicidal behavior. Dr. David Jobes at Catholic University created and designed a well focused, detailed, user-friendly form, called the Suicide Status Form (SSF, 2006). This form has three essential components that are initial, tracking, and outcome forms. Each section that both the client and clinician fill out to focus on the treatment plans, mental status at each office visit, treatment plan that the patient and clinician agrees to, and other relevant clinical material such as axis diagnoses for proper documentation. It essentially creates a written plan on getting better. The SSF is a very carefully made tool that clinicians can use to know how much pain, hopelessness, and likelihood the client may act on their feelings. This form is the best tool to know where the client is in their thought process because it clearly documents the distress they are feeling. The SSF also provides the client with a voice in their treatment rather than to have it dictated as the clinician seems fit, because after all “you do know best”. The client will feel more centered and relieved that someone is taking the time to listen to what is going on and work with them on what will work and what will not.
The next bridge is the crucial piece of what therapy is about:
Let him know that you know best
Cause after all you do know best
Try to slip past his defense
Without granting innocence
Lay down a list of what is wrong
The things you’ve told him all along
And pray to God he hears you
And I pray to God he hears you

According to Dr. Shneidman, “there are many pointless deaths, but never a needless suicide” (1995). Over his career, he has stated that the main element of suicide and suicidal thinking are frustrated needs. These are the “list of things that are wrong, things you’ve told him all along”.
In Shneidman’s Psychological pain assessment scale (1999), he lists twenty needs he feels are essential to the frustration one brings to think about suicide as an escape (for more detailed use of the scale, please see article). These needs are an adaptation of Henry Murray’s work, Explorations in Personality (1938).
The key to helping any suicidal person is to listen to what the person is saying. That is the most essential piece that any clinician can do. Jobes (2008) found in his clinical use of SSF’s one thing that was the level of the perturbation and stress involved with suicidal thinking as major correlate for suicidal behavior. This might be that pain becomes so jaded the person just doesn’t feel it and all they are left feeling is the urge to do something in the moment to relieve the pressure that is building up.
Learning new coping strategies may not be easy and some will work; others will not. In formulating this, it is up to the clinician to either “drive until you lose the road (client) or break with the ones you follow” (stick with what you know or try something different). O’Carroll (1996) did a survey of current assessments of suicide and found that not all clinicians (social workers, psychiatrists, psychologists, counselors) have the right definition of what it means to be suicidal. Each profession had their own beliefs and thoughts about what it means to be suicidal and propose a treatment for it. For a select few, some therapists even transferred the client to another clinician because of various reasons (David A. Jobes, 1995; David A. Jobes & Berman, 1993; David A. Jobes, Wong, Conrad, Drozd, & Neal-Walden, 2005; Joiner, Rudd, & Rajab, 1999; Joiner, Walker, Rudd, & Jobes, 1999; Meichenbaum, 2005; Michel, et al., 2002; Ramsay & Newman, 2005).
There is also David Rudd, et al (2006) Commitment to Treatment Statement (CTS). This is a formal written and verbal agreement, on paper, that the client is committing to live and as such, has decided to put suicide on hold to try and see if therapy can help achieve the goal of living rather than of dying. It is a novel way of thinking and is much better than the expense of the hospital (even though it might happen anyway) and the loss of life.
No one is an expert on suicide. There are predictive models that show the likelihood of risk factors that might cause a person to attempt. But these factors do not apply to everyone in the human race. Each suicide attempt or gesture is unique to that individual. There may be warning signs that go unnoticed until after an attempt or completed suicide. Psychological autopsies are valuable but they are too late to do much good to someone who is already dead. Their pain is no longer felt by them, just to those that knew them. You cannot save someone once they are dead. Nor can you learn much about the why and how they chose death to end their pain. As Dr. Shneidman points out, the best source of understanding suicide is through the “words of the suicidal person” (1996, p. 6).
In summary, these tools can be used in clinical practice. I know that most of these are not empirically based as of yet but does it matter to the client who is thinking these thoughts, is hurting so bad to want to end their life not to give it a try? You can “drive the until you lose the road, or break with the ones you follow”.

Lyrics to How to Save a Life: By The Fray (2005)

Step one you say we need to talk
He walks you say sit down it’s just a talk
He smiles politely back at you
You stare politely right on through
Some sort of window to your right
As he goes left and you stay right
Between the lines of fear and blame
You begin to wonder why you came

CHORUS:
Where did I go wrong, I lost a friend
Somewhere along in the bitterness
And I would have stayed up with you all night
Had I known how to save a life

Let him know that you know best
Cause after all you do know best
Try to slip past his defense
Without granting innocence
Lay down a list of what is wrong
The things you’ve told him all along
And pray to God he hears you
And I pray to God he hears you

CHORUS:
Where did I go wrong, I lost a friend
Somewhere along in the bitterness
And I would have stayed up with you all night
Had I known how to save a life

As he begins to raise his voice
You lower yours and grant him one last choice
Drive until you lose the road
Or break with the ones you’ve followed
He will do one of two things
He will admit to everything
Or he’ll say he’s just not the same
And you’ll begin to wonder why you came

CHORUS:
Where did I go wrong, I lost a friend
Somewhere along in the bitterness
And I would have stayed up with you all night
Had I known how to save a life

CHORUS:
Where did I go wrong, I lost a friend
Somewhere along in the bitterness
And I would have stayed up with you all night
Had I known how to save a life
How to save a life
How to save a life

CHORUS:
Where did I go wrong, I lost a friend
Somewhere along in the bitterness
And I would have stayed up with you all night
Had I known how to save a life

CHORUS:
Where did I go wrong, I lost a friend
Somewhere along in the bitterness
And I would have stayed up with you all night
Had I known how to save a life
How to save a life

References:

Holden, R. R., Mehta, K., Cunningham, E., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Development and preliminary validation of a scale of psychache. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(4), 224-232.
Jobes, D. A. (1995). The challenge and the promise of clinical suicidology. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 25(4), 437-449.
Jobes, D. A. (2006). Managing suicidal risk: A collaborative approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Jobes, D. A. (2008). CAMs workshop (lecture 41st American Association of Suicidology annual conference ed.).
Jobes, D. A., & Berman, A. L. (1993). Suicide and malpractice liability: Assessing and revising policies, procedures, and practice in outpatient settings. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24(1), 91-99.
Jobes, D. A., Moore, M. M., & O’Connor, S. S. (2007). Working with Suicidal Clients Using the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS). Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 29(4/October), 283-300.
Jobes, D. A., Wong, S. A., Conrad, A. K., Drozd, J. F., & Neal-Walden, T. (2005). The collaborative assessment and management of suicidality versus treatment as usual: A retrospective study with suicidal outpatients. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 35(5), 483-497.
Joiner, T. E., Rudd, M. D., & Rajab, M. H. (1999). Agreement Between Self-and Clinician-Rated Suicidal Symptoms in a Clinical Sample of Young Adults: Explaining Discrepancies. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 171-176.
Joiner, T. E., Walker, R. L., Rudd, M. D., & Jobes, D. A. (1999). Scientizing and Routinizing the Assessment of Suicidality in Outpatient Practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30(5), 447-453.
Meichenbaum, D. (2005). 35 Years of Working with suicidal Patients: Lessons Learned. Canadian Psychology, 46(2), 64-72.
Michel, K., Maltsberger, J. T., Jobes, D. A., Orbach, I., Stadler, K., Dey, P., et al. (2002). Discovering the Truth in Attempted Suicide. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 56(3), 424-437.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Carroll, P. W., Berman, A. L., Maris, R. W., Moscicki, E. K., Tanney, B. L., & Silverman, M. M. (1996). Beyond the Tower of Babel: A Nomenclature for Suicidology. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 26(3), 237-252.
Quinnett, P. G. (1987). Suicide: The forever decision. New York, NY: Continuum.
Ramsay, J. R., & Newman, C. F. (2005). After the Attempt: Maintaining the Therapeutic Alliance Following a Patient’s Suicide Attempt. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 35(4), 413-424.
Shneidman, E. (1985). Definition of Suicide (softcover ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Shneidman, E. (1995). Definition of Suicide: Jason Aronson.
Shneidman, E. S. (1985). Definition of Suicide: Aronson.
Shneidman, E. S. (1993). Suicide as psychache: A clinical approach to self-destructive behavior. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.
Shneidman, E. S. (1996). The Suicidal Mind: Oxford University Press.
Shneidman, E. S. (1999). The Psychological Pain Assessment Scale. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 29(4), 287-294.
Slade, I. (2005). How to save a Life Retrieved may 21, 2012

Copyrighted 2012, Collerone, G